🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat state that indecision on how best to tackle the problem is creating unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Historic Churchyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation details a range of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They intended this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. People will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing looking for treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while serving overseas. His parent said she could not sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to think this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some want additional coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to continue for now. Different voices argue the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the choices. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. It requires productive community discussions to discover the right solutions for each community.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical loss of sacred ground.